PADEP Proposes Classifying Manganese as Toxic Substance, Revising Water Quality Criteria

August 3, 2020 • Updated: February 12, 2021

In the July 25, 2020, edition of Pennsylvania Bulletin, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection published its “Water Quality Standard for Manganese and Implementation” as the proposed revisions to water quality criteria for manganese as advanced by the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) in December 2019.

Act 40 of 2017 directed the Department to present to the Environmental Quality Board regulations listing manganese as an exception in 25 Pa Code 96.3(d), with the intent to move the water quality criteria found in Chapter 93 (currently 1 mg/l) to the water intake instead of the facility’s discharge point. However, PADEP has resisted compliance with Act 40, instead proposing to classify manganese as a toxic substance.

The rulemaking package proposes to remove the current 1 mg/l Water Quality Standard in 25 PA Code § 93.7 and to add manganese to the list of toxic substances in 25 PA Code §93.8c, Table 5 at 300 ug/l or 0.3 mg/l on the basis of the potential for the ingestion of manganese to cause certain neurological effects.

Following the publishing of the proposed rule in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, three virtual public hearings were held in September 2020. The proposed rule was sent to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) for comment. The IRRC comments were provided on October 26, 2020.

The IRRC comments included:

  • A request that the EQB to explain how the inclusion of two alternative points of compliance is consistent with the intents of Act 40 and the General Assembly;
  • A request that the EQB review and consider the scientific data and studies provided by the commentators that are opposed to the lower standard; and, in the Preamble to the final-form regulation, the EQB clearly state and justify why the lower standard is needed and why the science on which the rulemaking is ultimately based is the most appropriate for the Commonwealth;
  • A request that the EQB explain why it is reasonable to impose a manganese standard that is lower than other states and why it is reasonable to regulate manganese in a manner different than the Environmental Protection Agency;
  • An observation that, since the representatives of the coal and aggregate industries had submitted comments questioning the science, need and cost associated with this proposal, the final-form regulation be presented to the Mining Reclamation Advisory Board and the Aggregate Advisory Board for input. The IRRC believed “these Boards could provide valuable input that could lead to a final regulation that is in the best interest of all citizens of the Commonwealth.”, and;
  • A question that, given that the proposed manganese standard is not consistent with the manner in which the EPA regulates manganese, if the EPA does not approve the lower standard, how will the Department proceed with the implementation of the rule making? The IRRC requested that the EQB explain this in the Preamble to the final-form rulemaking.

As of February, 11, 2021, the revision to the manganese water quality criteria remains proposed. The Final Regulation is due by September 26, 2022.

We’ll keep you updated on the status of this newly proposed criteria so that we can help you determine whether your next project could be impacted. If you have any questions, please contact Scott Rasmussen 724-327-5200 or srasmussen@cecinc.com.

About the Author


Scott Rasmussen

Scott is a Principal in our Environmental Engineering and Sciences Practice and works out of our Monroeville office. He has more than 37 years of experience in conducting and managing environmental assessment and compliance projects at mining, industrial, commercial, and residential properties.

Want more content like this?

Subscribe

Post a Comment


Your email address will not be published.